Montag, der 20. August 2018

Rechtspopulismus im queeren Gewand

Auf Facebook meldet sich ein neues Bündnis mit dem Namen „Ehrlos statt wehrlos – Bündnis gegen Neuköllner Unzumutbarkeiten“ zu Wort und behauptet, Straßengewalt in Berlin-Neukölln bekämpfen zu wollen. Seine Gründungserklärung zeigt jedoch, dass es ihm vor allem um eines geht: Gewalt soll als Problem auf bestimmte Gruppen ausgelagert werden, rechtspopulistische Sicherheitsdiskurse sollen in queeren Kreisen etabliert werden. Wir sagen: Nicht mit uns! Nur eine solidarische Stadt ist eine sichere Stadt!

Weiterlesen …
Montag, der 1. Januar 2018

The Queer Intersectional in Contemporary Germany

von Christopher Sweetapple(ed.)

With contributions by JudithButler, Zülfukar Çetin, Sabine Hark, Daniel Hendrickson, Heinz-Jürgen-Voß,

Salih Alexander Wolter and KorayYılmaz-Günay

2018-Sweetapple-The_Queer_Intersectional_in_Cont

Freitag, der 14. Juli 2017

Beyond Trans Visibility

from ALOK

2017: https://www.alokvmenon.com/blog/2017/7/14/beyond-trans-visibility

Originally written on Trans Day of Visibility 2015

1) “Trans” “Visibility” is an oxymoron. Trans is who we are, not what we we look like. We shouldn’t have to look like anything in particular in order to be believed for who we are. Visibility often is a form of (nonconsensual) labor that we have to in order to make our experiences coherent to others.

2) Trans Visibility is a cis framework. Who are we becoming visible for? Why do we have to become visible in order to be taken seriously? Non-trans people will congratulate themselves for our visibility but will not mention how they are the ones were responsible for erasing us in the first place. The trans movement isn’t about trans people moving forward, it’s about cis people catching up with us.

3) Invisibility is not the problem, transmisogyny is the problem. Trans people are harassed precisely because we ARE visible. Mandating visibility increases violence against the most vulnerable among us. The same system that will require trans people to be visible will not give institutional support to us when we are harassed precisely because we are visible.

4) Visibility often means incorporation. Often the only way we are respected as “legitimately” trans is if we appeal to dominant norms of beauty, gender, race, and establishment politics. Trans people should not have to be patriotic, change what we wear, undergo medical or legal transition, really should not have to do anything in order to be respected. We were and already are enough.

5) Visibility is easy. Organizing is hard. Sharing photos of trans people and calling us “resilient” and “beautiful” does little to address the persecution so many of us face. We cannot love ourselves out of structural oppression alone. How come media visibility of trans people has not resulted in the funding and support of our organizations, campaigns, and struggles?

Let’s push harder and demand more.